
Number 80, December 2005

Contracting Parties
We are very pleased to announce that Germany
has decided to join the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
German membership was unanimously approved at the October meeting
of the Programme’s Executive Committee; the IEA formalities
to complete membership are now in progress.
The German Federal Ministry for Economics and Labour (BMWA) has
designated Forschungszentrum Jülich as the Contracting Party
to the Implementing Agreement. German membership will bring added
strength and depth to the Programme’s activities for what
we hope will be a long and productive interaction.
We are also extremely pleased to announce that the Organisation
of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has, after consultations
with the IEA Secretariat, decided to apply to join the IEA GHG
Implementing Agreement. The OPEC Secretariat has expressed, on
many occasions, its interest as an intergovernmental organisation,
in dialogue and an exchange of views and experiences, in order
to turn the challenges facing the future energy scene into opportunities.
OPEC membership was unanimously approved at the October meeting
of the Programme’s Executive Committee; the IEA formalities
to complete membership are now in progress. The IEA Secretariat
has confirmed its support of OPEC involvement in the IEA GHG Programme.
Sponsors
We are pleased to announce that, following completion
of IEA procedures, Statoil is now formally a Sponsor of the IEA
Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme. Statoil, representing the Norwegian
Government, has been a major participant in the success of IEA
GHG since its inception. So, we in the Programme Team, are especially
pleased that Statoil will continue to support the Programme. This
change has occurred because the Norwegian Government has decided
to continue its involvement in the Programme through the Research
Council of Norway and Gassnova. Gassnova is the state centre for
sustainable gas technologies. It is a public agency reporting
to the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (www.gassnova.no)

Current membership of IEA GHG programme.
As announced previously BG-Group, E.ON AG, and Vattenfall are
taking part in the programme whilst membership formalities are
completed. These new members add considerably to the strength
and depth of the Programme’s membership.
Membership Character
The following analysis of Membership character
illustrates the depth and range of interests that are dealt with
in a spirit of co-operation in the IEA GHG Programme:
- Kyoto Protocol signatories (13)
- Non-Kyoto signatories (4)
- OECD Countries (13)
- Developing Countries (3)
- International Organisations with country membership (2)
- Governments (17)
- International companies: Oil and Gas (9)
- International companies and organisations: Power Industry
(4)
- International companies: Manufacturers supplying Energy
Industries (1)
IEAGHG is an inclusive forum in which countries
and other members take part in the production of informed information
on the role that technology can play in reducing greenhouse gas
emissions. Prospective members can find further information in
a membership guide that can be found on the IEAGHG website.
Back to Top
The IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA
GHG) has been actively involved with the drafting of the IPCC
Special Report on CO2 Capture and Storage
(SRCCS) for the last two years. The report was formally approved
and accepted by IPCC Working Group III and 24 Session of the IPCC
in Montreal, on 26th September 2005. The report comprises the
Summary for Policy Makers (SPM), the Technical Summary (TS) and
the main full report. Copies of the SPM and TS are now available
on the IPCC web site at www.ipcc.ch. The report was formally presented
by the Co-chairs (Bert Metz and Ogunlade Davison) of Working Group
III of the IPCC on 26th September 2005. A copy of the presentation
and the web cast of this event can also be found at www.ipcc.ch.

This report has involved an extensive drafting
prosess involving technical experts on CO2
Capture and Storage (CCS) drawn from around the world.The IEA
GHG Programme, its active members and associates supplied three
of the 9 co-ordinating lead authors and provided authors to 6
out of the nine technical chapters of the full report. The SRCCS
is a review of peer reviewd literature available in the public
domain before December 2004. Many of IEA GHG's own technical reports
were drawn upon as reference literature for the report, as were
the papers in the proceedings and peer reviewed journals that
developed after the GHGT conferences which IEA GHG organises.
The report indicates that geological storage
of CO2 has significant potential as amitigation
option. Ocean storage, however, is at an earlier developmental
stage and more research is needed to assess the suitabilityof
this option. Mineral carbonation is considered to be very energy
intensive and there are concerns about its environmental impact.
Industrial uses of CO2 are not expected
to contribute significantly to the abatement of CO2.
The IPCC SRCCS is expected to assist the technology
in gaining international acceptance and therefore move the technology
towards widespread implementaion. IEA GHG plan to assess the impact
the report has had on the CCS debate and with policy makers over
the coming months. In addition, IEA GHG are currently reviewing
the gaps in knowledge identified in the SRCCS with a view to providing
guidance to its members on key research and investment needs to
address these gaps.
Back to Top
The IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme is now
operating five international research networks relating to CO2
capture and storage. These research networks include:
- CO2 Capture Network - this is one
of IEA GHG’s oldest networks which has now been running
for seven years. The network focuses on developments in amine
scrubbing. It holds annual meetings which attract typically
some 40 delegates. The next meeting is planned for June 2006
in Copenhagen, to be hosted by Energi E2, just prior to the
GHGT-8 conference.
- Biofixation of CO2 and greenhouse
gas abatement with microalgae (see following article). The
next meeting is planned for May 2006 in Florence Italy, in
conjunction with the Aqua 2006 meeting.
For details on Aqua 2006 see the www.was.org (world aquaculture
society) web site.
- Monitoring network – the second meeting of this international
network was held in Rome in September 2004. The first meeting
held in 2005 assessed the current state of knowledge on monitoring
techniques. The Rome meeting opened a debate with regulatory
bodies on their thoughts on monitoring needs for CO2
storage sites. In addition, recent developments in monitoring
techniques and new thoughts on monitoring plans from an industry
perspective were discussed. The next meeting of the network
is scheduled to be held in Autumn 2006 in Melbourne, Australia
to be hosted by CSIRO/CO2CRC.
- Well bore integrity – this network was set up to
discuss issues regarding the integrity of operational and
abandoned wells. Wells are often highlighted by researchers
as areas for concern when assessing the long term integrity
of CO2 storage sites. The network
was launched in Houston in April 2005 and a second meeting
to further explore the issues identified is now being planned
for March 2006 to be hosted by Princeton University, USA.
- Risk Assessment – the newest of the networks to be
launched is that of Risk Assessment. An inaugural workshop
was held in Utrecht in August 2005 to discuss and develop
a plan for this network. It was agreed at that meeting that
the network should provide a focal point for international
research groups to present their risk assessment results in
an open and transparent manner. In this way the results generated
by the different groups can be understood and compared and
a compete picture of what the different research results are
telling us can be determined. A second meeting of this network
is being planned for San Francisco, USA in Autumn 2006, hosted
by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Members of the CO2 capture Network ata the latesr meeting
held in Austin, Texas at the start of October.

A visit to Vulcano Solfatara, near Pozzuoli in the Phlegrean
Fields (S.Italy),after the meeting of the Monitoring Network.
The volcano is still active, displaying hot springs and sulpherous
gases, and is considered to be a natural laboratory for geolocic
research. (Photo:Guanluca Patrignani)
A new network is currently in planning on
Oxyfuel combustion. An inaugural meeting of this new network
is planned for November 2005 to be held in Berlin and hosted
by Vattenfall (See Greenhouse Issues number 79).
Further information on all the network activities organised
by IEA GHG and its partners can be found at www.co2captureandstorage.info.
If anybody is interested in being placed on the mailing list
for the network workshops, please contact Sian Twinning at the
IEA GHG office (sian@ieaghg.org).
CO2 and Fine Cuisine
During the Rome meeting of the Monitoring network,
our attention was drawn to a recently opened establishment in
central Rome called the 'CO2 brassiere'.
The link between the name and the CO2
storage community could not be resisted, and as a result, an enjoyable
evening was spent by the network members at this brassiere. For
further details look at the web site at www.co2restaurant.it.
If anybody knows of any similar named establishments that have
or should be visited by CO2ers in the
course of their busy schedules please let us know at mail@ieaghg.org
Back to Top
By Paola M. Pedroni, EniTecnologie, Angela Manancourt,
IEA GHG, and John Benemann, Consultant
The International Network on Biofixation of CO2
and Greenhouse Gas Abatement with Microalgae, (“Biofixation
Network”) is a membership organisation of governmental,
industry, and other institutions supporting R&D in microalgae
biofixation of CO2 for greenhouse gas
(GHG) abatement and renewable fuel production. The network has
been operating within the IEA GHG Programme since June 2002. Its
main function is to provide a forum for exchange of information
and expertise, to foster collaborations and coordination among
the member R&D projects, and to provide them with technical
assistance in this specialized field. The strategic objective
of the Network is to develop practical microalgae-based processes
that would lead to the demonstration of technical feasibility
within ten years. A “Technology Roadmap” provides
a tool to help guide these R&D activities (www.co2captureandstorage.info/
networks/networks.htm).
The Network is directed by a Steering Committee comprising representatives
of the member organisations. The IEA GHG Programme provides management
support and technical activities are co-ordinated by a Network
Manager assisted by several Technical Advisers recruited from
the private sector and academe.
Currently, the Network has six members from four countries:
-
EniTechnologie (the R&D arm of the oil & gas company
Eni) and ENEL Produzione Ricerca (the R&D arm of the electric
utility ENEL), both in Italy;
-
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the National
Energy Technology Laboratory and the Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory;
-
TERI (an energy R&D institute) in India; and
-
CGTEE (an electric utility) in Brazil.
Microalgae Biofixation
Microalgae mass cultures can be used to capture
and utilise CO2 from power plants or
other sources. Mitigation of GHG emissions results from converting
the harvested biomass to renewable biofuels (methane, ethanol,
biodiesel) and fossil fuel-sparing products (such as fertilisers,
biopolymers and lubricants). Microalgae, microscopic aquatic plants,
are grown in large open, raceway-type paddle wheel-mixed ponds,
similar to those already used in commercial production of specialty
foods and feeds (Figure). The algae grow suspended in water and
are provided with all needed nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorous,
etc.) and, most importantly, CO2. They
are then harvested by settling and converted to renewable biofuels
and other co-products that reduce fossil fuel use.
Microalgae strains are selected based on desired characteristics,
principally stable growth in outdoor ponds, and ease of harvesting,
and then improved for additional desired attributes, most importantly
high productivity. Microalgae cultures have the potential for
achieving very high biomass production rates, over 100 metric
tons of organic matter per hectare per year, much higher than
trees or annual crops. However, research is still required to
achieve and demonstrate such high productivities in potentially
practical processes. A near-term application of microalgae-based
systems is in the treatment of wastewaters, in particular the
removal and recovery of nitrogen and phosphates. Such a wastewater
treatment function provides additional economic benefits and contributes
to GHG abatement through energy conservation, compared to current,
energy intensive, technologies.
Raceway Ponds for Microalgae Production (Earthrise
Farms, California, USA)
Ongoing Projects
Current projects being carried out within the
Network by the member organisations include:
- Growth of microalgae cultures outdoors in scale-down designed
open ponds and photobioreactors using simulated natural gas-fired
power plant flue gases (EniTecnologie, Monterotondo, Italy)
- Growth of microalgae cultures indoors in scale-down designed
photobioreactors and, recently, also outdoors and in open
ponds, using simulated coal-fired power plant flue gases (ENEL,
Brindisi, Italy).
- Growth of microalgae cultures outdoors in scale-down small
and large (5 to 3 000 m2) open ponds for removal of nutrients
from agricultural drainage waters (Kent SeaTech, Inc., California,
and Clemson University, South Carolina, supported by the U.S.
DOE).
- Development of genetically improved algal strains and outdoor
pond culture techniques for achieving increased productivity
and solar energy conversion efficiencies, and, also, for fertiliser
production (SeaAg, Inc., Florida, and Brooklyn College, New
York, supported by the U.S. DOE).
- Study of the relationship between growth rate and productivity
and also H2 production by microalgae (Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory, Supported by U.S. DOE - National Energy Technology
Laboratory).
- Projects in Brazil and India are at the start-up or planning
stages, they also involve flue gas CO2
utilisation and waste treatment with microalgae.
Outlook
The main advantages of microalgae mass cultures,
compared to other biological options for CO2
capture and utilisation, is their potential to achieve very high
productivities, their ability to capture nutrients from wastewaters,
their use of waste, brackish and saline water sources unsuitable
for other uses, and their actually high water use efficiency.
The use of microalgae processes in GHG abatement will likely be
part of multipurpose processes providing additional, to biofuels
and GHG abatement, products and services, including wastewater
treatment, animal feeds, biopolymers, etc.
The global potential of microalgae biofixation processes in GHG
mitigation has not yet been properly assessed, and requires evaluation
of a variety of potential processes and the large diversity of
applicable CO2, wastewater and other
resources, as well as geographic factors. Such an evaluation is
now being carried out by TNO in the Netherlands and will be reported
on in a future Newsletter Issues. Microalgae biofixation processes
are a subset of the biological CO2 capture
and utilization technologies that form part of the broad portfolio
of GHG abatement technologies which must be developed to achieve
the goal of a stabilised atmosphere.
Back to Top
Preparations for the 8th International Conference
on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies to be held in Trondheim,
Norway between 19th and 22nd June 2006 are now well advanced.
The call for abstracts closed on 10th September 2005. Some 570
abstracts were submitted by prospective authors for consideration
by the Programme Committee for presentation at the conference.
Abstracts were submitted from 34 different countries which demonstrate
the broad degree of international interest in the conference.
The conference organisers are working to improve the quality of
the technical programme of the conference and to that end more
extensive abstracts were requested for GHGT-8 than had been required
for previous conferences.
The abstracts submitted are now being reviewed by the Technical
Committee which comprises some 55 experts drawn mostly from the
Scandinavian region, with input from most IEA GHG member countries.
The review of the abstracts will be completed by the end of November
and then the technical programme for the 4 day conference will
be drawn up by the Programme Committee. Authors will be notified
by December 16th on whether their paper has been selected for
oral or poster presentation at the conference.
Typically, some 200 to 220 papers are selected for oral presentation
at the GHGT conferences over the 4 day period. All papers presented
at the conference will be made available in the conference proceedings.
It is intended that a selection of papers from the conference
will also be made available in a special edition of a well known
scientific journal after the conference.
On-line registration will open in January 2006 and details can
be found at www.ghgt8.no

The Ravnkloa fish market with the Nidaros
Cathederal and the Archbishop's Palace in the background (Photo
© Trondheim kommune).
By Olav Bolland, NTNU
The 3rd Trondheim Conference on CO2
capture, transport and storage was held 10th-11th October 2005.
It was attended by about 100 people and hot topics this year were
policies for CCS to happen in Norway and globally, and novel developments
in CO2 capture technologies.
The opening session was chaired by Nils Røkke and included
key speakers from CICERO, SINTEF, IEA-GHG, GASSNOVA, US-DoE and
BELLONA( NGO). Pål Prestrud (CICERO) set the scene by pointing
out that in Norway and the Arctic, we will see almost a doubling
in temperature increase compared to global average increases.
Bjørn Erik Haugan (GASSNOVA) gave a survey of national
funding instruments for CO2 related R&D
and Demonstration- a total of about 18m€ is available per
annum for such efforts. John Gale gave an overview of the IPCC
summary report on CO2; although wide
ranges and options are given- CCS is concluded to have a large
potential impact for CO2 mitigation.
We also learned about the bi-lateral agreements within CCS between
US and Norway and the US/NO Late summer school on CO2
which was arranged as part of the event from Pamela Tomski. Both
Gunnar Sand (SINTEF) and Fredric Hauge (Bellona) stressed the
importance of starting with real actions within CCS and Bellona
referred to their recently released report for CO2
management.
In addition to the scientific part of the conference, a guided
tour to the Archbishops Yard was included; this is the reception
area for next year’s GHGT-8 conference.
The proceedings and programme from the Third Trondheim Conference
can be found at www.energy.sintef.no/arr/
CO2_2005/

The Archbishop's Residence and Nidaros Cathedral
(Photo by Jørn Adde © Trondheim kommune)
Due to circumstances beyond the organiser’s
control, issue of the proceedings from the 7th International Conference
on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies has been delayed. Delegates
of the conference will receive their copy of the proceedings by
the end of November. We apologize for the delay.
The Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies conference series has
established itself as the foremost conference bringing together
the international energy community, providing a forum for the
discussion of the latest advances in the field of greenhouse gas
control technologies.
Orders for the proceedings can be placed with the publishers,
Elsevier. (www.elsevier.com)
ISBN: 0-08-044704-X, 2700 pages Prices: EUR 220, USD 300, GBP
150
The 27th Consultative meeting of the Contracting
Parties to the London Convention was held at the International
Maritime Organisation (IMO) headquarters 24th-28th October 2005.
The meeting “acknowledged that CO2
sequestration in sub-seabed geological structures had a role to
play, as part of a suite of measures to tackle the challenge of
climate change and ocean acidification” This is an important
step towards clearly establishing the legality of off-shore CO2
storage.
The meeting noted a report by the IMO’s Technical Working
Group on CO2 Sequestration which had
concluded that CO2 sequestration in sub-seabed
geological structures was technically feasible and that a considerable
body of evidence and experience existed on CO2
sequestration, including sequestration technologies, technical
mitigation options for CO2 leakage and
monitoring methods.
It was noted that there were gaps in the knowledge related to
possible impacts on the marine environment and in technology,
such as monitoring techniques. The meeting decided that it would
be necessary to develop an assessment framework for the evaluation
and management of potential risks to the environment. To further
this work the meeting agreed to establish a ‘Science Group
– Intersessional Technical Working Group on CO2
Sequestration’. The group will be led by the USA and is
scheduled to meet from 3rd-7th April 2006.
Following a review and analysis of the views of Contracting Parties
that was prepared by the UK; other points of agreement from the
meeting on this issue were:
- It was agreed that the London Convention and Protocol, which
provide the specific global framework for the protection of
the marine environment against pollution from dumping at sea,
were appropriate global instruments to address the implications
of CO2 sequestration in sub-seabed
geological structures for the marine environment;
- It was recognised that there were varying interpretations
of how the Convention and Protocol apply in different circumstances
to CO2 sequestration in sub-seabed
geological structures;
- It was decided that it was desirable to consider options for
facilitating and / or regulating CO2 sequestration
in sub- seabed geological structures including clarification
(and, if appropriate, amendment) of the Protocol and the Convention;
- It was agreed to convene the ‘Intersessional Legal
and Related Issues Working Group on CO2
Sequestration’, to develop a menu of options to clarify
(and, if appropriate amend) the Protocol and Convention, with
a view to facilitating and/or regulating the use of CO2
sequestration in sub-seabed geological structures. (This working
group is tentatively scheduled to meet from 10th-13th April
2006.)
The next (28th) Consultative Meeting will consider how best
to facilitate and/or regulate CO2 sequestration
in sub-seabed geological structures.
The World Petroleum Council (WPC) provides a
forum for discussing the issues facing the oil industry on a worldwide
basis and is strictly non-political. The WPC is dedicated to the
application of scientific advances in the oil and gas industries,
to technology transfer and to the use of the world’s petroleum
resources for the benefit of mankind. The WPC’s 61 member
countries represent over 90% of the worlds major oil and gas producing
and consuming nations of the world. Each country has a national
committee made up from representatives of the oil and gas industry,
academia and research institutions and government departments.
The World Petroleum Congress is the WPC’s showcase which
is held every 3 years. The 18th congress was held in Johannesburg
on 25-29th September 2005.
IEA GHG was invited to lead a round-table at
the congress on Climate Change Initiatives. The sub-title was
‘public perception’. Taking part in the round table
with IEAGHG’s Harry Audus were: Lars Ingolf Eide representing
the Carbon capture Project, Rob Cormie, Director Cooperate Finance,
KPMG, and Steve Lennon, MD Resources and Strategy, Eskom representing
the World Energy Council. There was a general acceptance from
the audience at the round table that climate change was an issue
that the oil industry had to do something about. Most of the discussion
was on what was needed to make carbon capture and storage happen.
Perhaps not surprisingly this ‘public’ audience of
oil industry people did not see storage of CO2
underground as being particularly difficult or of much concern.
Much of the conference discussion was on the need for infrastructure
development of new hydrocarbon resources in an uncertain financial
climate. Some papers dealt with revisiting old ‘brown-field’
sites with new well patterns – which raises issues for CCS
on the possibility of CO2 storage in
‘depleted’ oil fields. CCS issues were well to the
fore and discussed in a number of sessions. CO2
for EOR was very topical, the main issue being how to make the
financial incentives work. There were also several advocates of
working towards a ‘hydrogen economy’ but there was
a strong reaction from some that hydrogen was always going to
be too expensive to use as an energy carrier.
The next WPC Congress will be in Madrid in 2008. www.world-petroleum.org/
The topic of Oxy-fuel combustion is attracting
much interest. We reported in Greenhouse Issues, number 78, on
Vattenfall’s plans to build a pilot plant near Berlin, and
in the last issue (number 79), on a planned meeting aimed at forming
an IEA GHG International Network to promote dialogue between research
groups active in oxy-fuel R&D.
At the time of writing, this meeting (to be held 29th and 30th
November) was over-subscribed and we could not cope with any more
attendees. The outcome of the meeting will be reported in the
next Newsletter.
Readers potentially interested in this area should refer to the
Greenhouse Cuttings section on Total and Alstom.
|